[Nagiosplug-devel] Kickoff for 1.5
sean finney
seanius at seanius.net
Tue Mar 8 21:20:02 CET 2005
hi ton,
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 08:03:27PM +0000, Ton Voon wrote:
> I don't personally use SNMP, but it does feel like there are a lot of
> redundant pieces. There probably needs to be a bit of thought in how it
> hangs together.
my thoughts exactly. i don't claim to know the best way to proceed
with this, but would like to help find out :)
> What exactly do you think needs doing? Subendu is the resident expert
> in SNMP, so I'll leave him to decide the direction here.
i think there are a few facets to this:
- availability/selection of snmp plugins
bringing in as many snmp-like checks as possible. for unix hosts
there's all kinds of stuff in the ucd/net and host mibs. i could
build a list if it'd be helpful.
- consistancy of snmp plugin interface
common cmdline interface, normalized cmd naming scheme. there'll be
some cmdline options that will be common to every plugin (community,
snmp version, host, port), and some that aren't.
- consolidation of duplicate code
depending on what we learn from the above two, it might make
sense to develop a common code base to reduce code redundancy.
some thoughts, anyway
sean
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://www.monitoring-plugins.org/archive/devel/attachments/20050308/8e5a07e1/attachment.sig>
More information about the Devel
mailing list